The relationship evidence register

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → accessiBe Inc.: Established the US subsidiary, according to the FTC complaint. Period: 2020. ²

qualification

The ownership finding is stated in the consent order. The complaint’s broader common-enterprise and commingling allegations were not admissions by the companies. Earlier court submissions describing the Israeli company’s operations refer to an earlier period.

response

The respondents neither admitted nor denied the complaint’s allegations apart from the jurisdictional facts admitted for the proceeding.

attributedK1 Investment Management → accessiBe Ltd.: Lead Series A investor. Period: May 2020–August 2022 rounds. ^{3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10}

qualification

These are announced and reported financing amounts, not audited cash balances or a company valuation. The exact Phoenix investing legal entity and the investors’ percentages are not established.

attributedNadav Dakner → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. ^{4 11 8 9}

qualification

The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting.

attributedOron Yaffe → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. ^{4 11 8 9}

qualification

The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting.

attributedElad Mor → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. ^{11 8}

qualification

The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting.

attributedItai Elizur → accessiBe Ltd.: Early private investor. Period: 2019 seed round. ^{11 8}

qualification

The retained material does not establish each investor’s amount, percentage or current holding. Later secondary sources repeat the early reporting.

attributedK1 Investment Management → accessiBe Ltd.: Minority investor according to contemporaneous reporting. Period: February 2021 report; percentage undisclosed. ¹¹

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedGlilot Capital Partners → accessiBe Ltd.: Participant in Series A extension. Period: August 2022; exact stake undisclosed. ^{5 10 12}

qualification

These are announced and reported financing amounts, not audited cash balances or a company valuation. The exact Phoenix investing legal entity and the investors’ percentages are not established.

attributedThe Phoenix → accessiBe Ltd.: Participant in Series A extension; exact Phoenix entity unspecified. Period: August 2022. ^{5 13 10 12}

qualification

The shared corporate number supports the name history of that public company. It does not identify which group entity invested in accessiBe; the group label and the registered parent remain separate records.

attributedArik Kleinstein → accessiBe Ltd.: Personal investor, distinct from the Glilot fund. Period: February 2021 report. ⁷

qualification

Kleinstein’s personal investment and the fund’s investment are distinct roles. The retained records do not disclose their percentages.

attributedItai Elizur → accessiBe Ltd.: Investor and adviser according to business profile. Period: Date and present holding unverified. ¹⁶

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedNicholas A. Groat → Safe Life Defense, LLC: Owner according to business profile. Period: Retained profile; percentage unverified. ¹⁸

qualification

These records help distinguish the customer organizations and their personnel. They do not establish the merits of the customers’ case against accessiBe.

attributedK1 Investment Management → accessiBe Ltd.: Listed portfolio investment. Period: Retained portfolio page at October 2026 cutoff. ^{19 20}

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedK1 Investment Management → Onit, Inc.: Listed portfolio investment. Period: Retained portfolio page. ¹⁹

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedNadav Dakner → accessiBe Ltd.: Investor and adviser according to profile. Period: Date and present holding unverified. ²¹

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedElad Mor → accessiBe Ltd.: Investor and adviser according to profile. Period: From May 2019 in profile; present holding unverified. ²²

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedGlilot Capital Partners → Guardz Cyber Ltd.: Listed investor. Period: Retained team page. ²³

qualification

Shared investors and an executive’s move do not establish a corporate transaction with accessiBe. The exact Phoenix investing entity and investment amounts remain unspecified.

attributedThe Phoenix → Guardz Cyber Ltd.: Listed Phoenix investor; precise legal entity unspecified. Period: Retained team page. ²³

qualification

Shared investors and an executive’s move do not establish a corporate transaction with accessiBe. The exact Phoenix investing entity and investment amounts remain unspecified.

attributedRoy Gefen → accessiBe Ltd.: Early investor according to guest biography. Period: 2021 biography; stake unspecified. ²⁶

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedRobert Lopez → accessiBe Ltd.: CEO appointed 6 May 2025. Period: From May 2025; retained announcement. ^{1 2 3 4 5}

qualification

The appointment and prior Justworks role are company statements. The retained record establishes no personal regulatory allegation against Lopez; shared or similar names are not identity evidence.

attributedDekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Former CEO; continued board and strategy involvement announced. Period: May 2025 succession. ²

qualification

The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection.

attributedRobert Lopez → Justworks: Former chief revenue officer; later adviser. Period: Before December 2024. ^{2 5}

qualification

The appointment and prior Justworks role are company statements. The retained record establishes no personal regulatory allegation against Lopez; shared or similar names are not identity evidence.

attributedDekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-founder. Period: Foundation period. ^{2 6}

qualification

Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage.

attributedGal Vizel → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-founder. Period: Foundation period. ^{2 6}

qualification

Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage.

attributedShir Ekerling → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-founder. Period: Foundation period. ^{2 6 7}

qualification

Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage.

attributedShir Ekerling → accessiBe Ltd.: CEO or co-CEO in historical accounts. Period: 2020–2023 accounts; exact title dates conflict. ^{8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15}

qualification

A profile’s CEO end date in June 2022 conflicts with contemporary references to later CEO or co-CEO service. The record does not establish an exact continuous title history or a current executive role at accessiBe.

attributedGal Vizel → accessiBe Ltd.: Marketing executive and co-founder. Period: Early business; secondary profile through March 2021. ^{8 16}

qualification

Profile dates are secondary accounts, not corporate appointment records. His later venture does not establish a transaction or ownership relationship between Diffi and accessiBe.

attributedDekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Operations executive and co-founder. Period: Early business; secondary profile through June 2022. ^{8 10 17 18}

qualification

The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection.

attributedMike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: Principal in the investment announcement. Period: May 2020. ⁹

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedMike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: Vice president, according to a career profile. Period: From 2016; later titles differ. ¹⁹

qualification

K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates.

attributedKobi Samboursky → Glilot Capital Partners: Co-founder and managing partner. Period: Fund founded in 2011; present mandate unverified. ²⁰

qualification

Kleinstein’s personal investment and the fund’s investment are distinct roles. The retained records do not disclose their percentages.

attributedArik Kleinstein → Glilot Capital Partners: Co-founder and managing partner. Period: Fund founded in 2011; present mandate unverified. ^{20 21 22}

qualification

Kleinstein’s personal investment and the fund’s investment are distinct roles. The retained records do not disclose their percentages.

attributedMichael Hingson → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief vision officer and sponsored podcast host. Period: Announced February 2021; own account October 2025. ^{23 3 24 13 25}

qualification

These are company and personal accounts. His connection with the NFB does not make that organization responsible for, or a general endorser of, accessiBe’s products.

attributedMichael Farlekas → accessiBe Ltd.: Executive chairman according to secondary profiles. Period: Profile dates role from November 2024. ^{26 3 27}

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedMichael Farlekas → Onit, Inc.: CEO; official announcement effective 1 March 2024. Period: 2024; January dates in other sources conflict. ^{28 26 27 29}

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedDekel Skoop → Ykey: Co-founder and marketing executive according to profiles. Period: 2016–2019 profile dates. ^{32 18}

qualification

No retained registry extract establishes Ykey’s ownership percentages or legal continuity with accessiBe.

attributedGal Vizel → Ykey: Co-founder and CEO according to profiles. Period: 2016–2019 profile dates. ^{32 16}

qualification

No retained registry extract establishes Ykey’s ownership percentages or legal continuity with accessiBe.

attributedSteve Faulkner → TetraLogical: Co-founder and director. Period: Retained professional biography. ^{33 34}

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedSteve Faulkner → TPGi: Former chief accessibility officer. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. ^{33 34}

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedSteve Faulkner → Vision Australia: Former senior web accessibility consultant. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. ³³

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedDekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Co-CEO named in financing coverage. Period: August 2022. ³⁵

qualification

The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection.

attributedMike Velcich → accessiBe Ltd.: K1 board representative according to reporting. Period: May 2020 report; present mandate unconfirmed. ¹⁰

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedMike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: K1 representative on accessiBe's board, according to reporting. Period: 2020 report. ¹⁰

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedGal Vizel → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief revenue officer. Period: Historical sources; profile through January 2025. ^{10 17 16}

qualification

Profile dates are secondary accounts, not corporate appointment records. His later venture does not establish a transaction or ownership relationship between Diffi and accessiBe.

attributedMichael Farlekas → Roadnet Technologies, Inc.: Former executive at Roadnet. Period: 2012–2014 corporate biography. ²⁸

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedMichael Farlekas → RedPrairie Corporation: Former executive at RedPrairie. Period: 2001–2012 corporate biography. ²⁸

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedNadav Dakner → MarketAcross: Founder or co-founder according to business profiles. Period: Retained profiles; present mandate unverified. ^{36 37}

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedElad Mor → MarketAcross: Co-founder and CEO according to business profiles. Period: Retained profiles; present mandate unverified. ^{36 38}

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedItai Elizur → MarketAcross: Co-founder and managing partner according to profiles. Period: Retained profiles; present mandate unverified. ^{36 39}

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedDekel Skoop → accessiBe Ltd.: Former CEO. Period: Through May 2025 succession announcement. ^{41 42 18}

qualification

The public consent version has blank signature and date lines, so the named capacity is not proof of a signed date. Secondary profiles give partly overlapping early role periods. Guardz’s page does not establish his start date or the end of every accessiBe connection.

attributedMichael Farlekas → Eagle Parent Holdings LLC: CEO according to a secondary career record. Period: Date and present mandate unverified. ²⁷

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedMichael Farlekas → E2open: Director of an E2open entity according to a secondary record. Period: Date and exact group company unverified. ²⁷

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedRobert Lopez → Groupon: Former general manager and managing director. Period: June 2011–May 2014 profile dates. ⁵

qualification

The appointment and prior Justworks role are company statements. The retained record establishes no personal regulatory allegation against Lopez; shared or similar names are not identity evidence.

attributedItai Elizur → INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD: Co-founder according to business profile. Period: Retained profile. ³⁹

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedItai Elizur → Chainwire: Co-founder according to business profile. Period: Retained profile. ³⁹

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedMike Velcich → K1 Investment Management: Partner in later profiles and team page. Period: Later source dates; precise promotion date unverified. ^{29 45 46}

qualification

K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates.

attributedJosh Basile → accessiBe Ltd.: Community relations manager. Period: Retained company announcement. ⁴⁷

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedSapir Yarden → accessiBe Ltd.: Nonprofit partnership program lead. Period: Retained company announcement. ⁴⁷

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedYan Kotliarsky → accessiBe Ltd.: Vice president of marketing according to historical account. Period: 2020 account; later mandate unverified. ¹³

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedMike Velcich → FC Capital Management LLC: Former vice president. Period: 2014–2016 secondary profile. ⁴⁵

qualification

K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates.

attributedMike Velcich → Adams Street Partners LLC: Former associate. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. ⁴⁵

qualification

K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates.

attributedMike Velcich → Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors LP: Former associate. Period: Earlier career; date unspecified. ⁴⁵

qualification

K1’s general governance rights and firmwide assets do not establish its rights, stake or investment amount in accessiBe. Secondary career profiles contain different title dates.

attributedNadav Dakner → INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD: Founder and CEO according to profile. Period: Retained profile. ³⁷

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedNadav Dakner → Chainwire: Co-founder and CEO according to profile. Period: Retained profile. ³⁷

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedElad Mor → INBOUNDJUNCTION LTD: Managing partner according to profile. Period: Retained profile. ³⁸

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedElad Mor → Chainwire: Co-founder according to profile. Period: From May 2019 in profile. ³⁸

qualification

These identity and professional links do not establish that any of those businesses supplied the unnamed marketing campaign alleged by the FTC. Brand ownership is not proof of the entire corporate group’s ownership chain.

attributedAdrian Roselli → Algonquin Studios: Former co-founder and vice president. Period: 1998–2015 biography. ⁴⁸

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedRoy Gefen → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief marketing officer in company/media accounts. Period: 2021 and later undated accounts; present mandate unverified. ^{50 51}

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedMasha Koski Zaks → accessiBe Ltd.: Vice president of brand. Period: January 2023 announcement; present mandate unverified. ⁵²

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedShir Ekerling → accessiBe Ltd.: President according to secondary career profile. Period: March 2024–May 2025. ¹⁵

qualification

A profile’s CEO end date in June 2022 conflicts with contemporary references to later CEO or co-CEO service. The record does not establish an exact continuous title history or a current executive role at accessiBe.

attributedGil Magen → accessiBe Ltd.: Head of marketing communications. Period: From November 2021 in profile. ^{13 53}

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedGal Vizel → Diffi Technologies Ltd.: Co-founder according to secondary profile. Period: Later profile; start date unverified. ⁵⁴

qualification

Profile dates are secondary accounts, not corporate appointment records. His later venture does not establish a transaction or ownership relationship between Diffi and accessiBe.

attributedShir Ekerling → Diffi Technologies Ltd.: Co-founder according to secondary profile. Period: Later profile; start date unverified. ⁵⁴

qualification

A profile’s CEO end date in June 2022 conflicts with contemporary references to later CEO or co-CEO service. The record does not establish an exact continuous title history or a current executive role at accessiBe.

attributedDekel Skoop → Guardz Cyber Ltd.: Chief business officer on company team page. Period: Retained undated team page. ⁵⁵

qualification

Shared investors and an executive’s move do not establish a corporate transaction with accessiBe. The exact Phoenix investing entity and investment amounts remain unspecified.

attributedYaniv Aronowich → accessiBe Ltd.: Former legal leader; described as CLO or vice president. Period: 2021–May 2026 accounts. ^{56 57}

qualification

The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis.

attributedNiv Penso → accessiBe Ltd.: Chief technology officer in retained profile. Period: Source date; present mandate unverified. ⁵³

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedHaim Repael Azoulay → accessiBe Ltd.: Vice president of design in retained profile. Period: Source date; present mandate unverified. ⁵³

qualification

These are roles at the source dates, not a verified current management roster. A 2021 guest biography calls Gefen an early investor but gives no stake or transaction record.

attributedYaniv Aronowich → Epstein Rosenblum Maoz: Joined as partner. Period: May 2026 report. ⁵⁷

qualification

The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Arnon, Tadmor-Levy: Client in the K1 financing transaction. Period: 2021. ¹

qualification

The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Yaniv Aronowich: Client of transaction counsel. Period: 2021. ¹

qualification

The retained records do not fix exact appointment dates. The April 2025 article was labelled sponsored content and is a company-authored interpretation of the Hidalgo case, not independent judicial analysis.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Routier: Reported acquisition of Routier or its team. Period: July 2021 / June 2022; unresolved date and deal form. ^{2 3}

qualification

The accounts give July 2021 and June 2022 as different transaction dates. No retained transaction agreement resolves the date, whether shares or assets were acquired, or the consideration.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Webdesigner Depot: Alleged buyer of paid promotional review. Period: September 2020; FTC complaint allegation. ⁴

qualification

The complaint is an allegation source, and it does not identify the unnamed agency as MarketAcross, InboundJunction or any investor’s business.

response

accessiBe denied the FTC’s allegations and criticized the investigation’s testing and historical information.

outcome

The final consent order regulates representations of independent endorsements and material-connection disclosures without an admission of the complaint’s allegations.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → uxplanet.org: Alleged buyer of paid promotional review. Period: September 2020; FTC complaint allegation. ⁴

qualification

The complaint is an allegation source, and it does not identify the unnamed agency as MarketAcross, InboundJunction or any investor’s business.

response

accessiBe denied the FTC’s allegations and criticized the investigation’s testing and historical information.

outcome

The final consent order regulates representations of independent endorsements and material-connection disclosures without an admission of the complaint’s allegations.

attributedHaben Girma → National Federation of the Blind: Former legal representative in accessibility litigation. Period: Historical professional biography. ⁵

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → David A. Hidalgo, M.D., P.C.: Reported widget supplier to the medical practice. Period: Company account of the January 2025 decision. ^{7 8}

qualification

The judgment does not name accessiBe or accessWidget and does not certify a branded product. The broader remediation record, rather than the widget alone, supported the mootness analysis. The company’s claim that no customer lost because of its widget is narrower than, and not disproved merely by, a denied dismissal motion.

response

The company credits its tool and litigation-support team; its marketing account remains distinct from what the judgment actually says.

outcome

The customer won dismissal on jurisdictional grounds; there was no trial determination of universal widget compliance.

attributedDillon Music → accessiBe Inc.: Widget customer and plaintiff. Period: 2024–2026 customer action. ⁹

qualification

The March 2026 opinion recounts allegations accepted as true for the dismissal motion. It does not adjudicate their truth or prove that the widget caused a lawsuit.

response

accessiBe disputed liability and relied on contractual limitations and the defined scope of technical support.

outcome

Most causes of action were dismissed; the narrower compliance-representation contract theory remained.

attributedSafe Life Defense, LLC → accessiBe Inc.: Former widget customer and plaintiff. Period: 2024–2026 customer action. ⁹

qualification

The March 2026 opinion recounts allegations accepted as true for the dismissal motion. It does not adjudicate their truth or prove that the widget caused a lawsuit.

response

accessiBe disputed liability and relied on contractual limitations and the defined scope of technical support.

outcome

Most causes of action were dismissed; the narrower compliance-representation contract theory remained.

attributedaccessiBe Inc. → SoulFlora Inc.: Supplier identified by purchase invoice. Period: Retained customer docket. ¹⁰

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → American Dental Associates, LTD.: Reported accessWidget supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. ¹¹

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Exit 9 Brooklyn, Inc.: Reported accessWidget supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. ¹¹

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Inc. → Buffalo Jackson Trading Co., LLC: Reported plugin supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. ¹¹

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Pure Green NYC Wholesale Corp.: Reported widget supplier to a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. ^{11 12}

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → The Spice & Tea Exchange Distribution, LLC: Supplier of a report offered in customer litigation. Period: December 2024 decision; mootness request denied. ^{12 13}

qualification

accessiBe was not a party. This decision concerns the submitted proof and procedural burden in one client’s case, not a general damages judgment against the vendor.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → U.S. Wings, Inc.: Reported accessibility technology supplier. Period: Historical litigation record. ¹²

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Grace Products, Inc.: Accessibility consultant in customer's litigation record. Period: September 2021 decision; mootness request denied. ^{12 14}

qualification

The court held that the defendant had not met the demanding mootness burden. It did not decide every product claim or impose liability on nonparty accessiBe.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Lemongrass Holdings LLC: Reported accessibility-audit supplier. Period: Historical litigation record. ¹²

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → PhotonLight.com, Inc.: Associated with customer's audit evidence; authorship of wrong-site report not established. Period: October 2024 decision. ¹⁵

qualification

accessiBe was not a party. The wrong-site submission does not, by itself, establish whether the vendor generated the wrong document or the litigant submitted it.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → BigCommerce: Strategic sales partner in venue submissions. Period: 2021–2022 litigation record. ¹⁶

qualification

The names identify reported commercial roles at those dates. They do not establish ownership, present contracts, responsibility for product claims or wrongdoing by the partners.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Volusion: Strategic sales partner in venue submissions. Period: 2021–2022 litigation record. ¹⁶

qualification

The names identify reported commercial roles at those dates. They do not establish ownership, present contracts, responsibility for product claims or wrongdoing by the partners.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Upright Technologies, Inc.: Reported widget supplier. Period: Historical customer account. ¹⁷

qualification

The settlement agreements and all pleadings are not retained here. Settlement is not a merits judgment, and accessiBe was not the defendant in those customer cases.

response

accessiBe denied that Eyebobs and Masterbuilt used its product at the disputed times. Later, accessiBe said Eyebobs declined support, while Eyebobs said its requests for meetings went unanswered and it had stopped using accessiBe.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Masterbuilt Manufacturing, LLC: Reported plugin supplier. Period: September 2020 customer record. ¹⁷

qualification

The settlement agreements and all pleadings are not retained here. Settlement is not a merits judgment, and accessiBe was not the defendant in those customer cases.

response

accessiBe denied that Eyebobs and Masterbuilt used its product at the disputed times. Later, accessiBe said Eyebobs declined support, while Eyebobs said its requests for meetings went unanswered and it had stopped using accessiBe.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → UserWay: Commercial competitor in public comparisons. Period: 2021 and later accounts. ^{17 18 19}

qualification

Omission from a later material-litigation list could reflect completion or a materiality judgment; it does not prove a settlement or victory. UserWay’s own marketing claims are not proof of accessiBe’s product performance.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Eyebobs, LLC: Supplier to a former customer. Period: Historical critical account. ¹⁷

qualification

The settlement agreements and all pleadings are not retained here. Settlement is not a merits judgment, and accessiBe was not the defendant in those customer cases.

response

accessiBe denied that Eyebobs and Masterbuilt used its product at the disputed times. Later, accessiBe said Eyebobs declined support, while Eyebobs said its requests for meetings went unanswered and it had stopped using accessiBe.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Digital Ocean: Named commercial partner. Period: May 2020 announcement. ¹⁷

qualification

The names identify reported commercial roles at those dates. They do not establish ownership, present contracts, responsibility for product claims or wrongdoing by the partners.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → eSSENTIAL Accessibility: Commercial competitor criticized by eSSENTIAL over overlay claims. Period: Historical public debate. ²⁰

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedDillon Music → Pedro Liz: Defendant in a separate accessibility action. Period: May 2024 reported filing. ¹⁴

qualification

These records help distinguish the customer organizations and their personnel. They do not establish the merits of the customers’ case against accessiBe.

attributedShir Ekerling → DL1961 Premium Denim, Inc.: Declarant supporting a customer defendant. Period: Historical litigation record. ²³

qualification

These are individually identified procedural or product-reference records, often snippets rather than complete case files. They do not establish outcomes, causal effects of the widget or the vendor’s liability. Similar counsel names do not prove a vendor-funded defense arrangement.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → National MS Society: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. ¹

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → United Cerebral Palsy: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. ^{1 2}

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Special Olympics USA Games: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. ^{1 2}

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Disability Foundation: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained undated company page. ¹

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → National Federation of the Blind: Subject of the NFB's criticism of overlay claims. Period: 2021; secondary date corrected against primary statement. ^{3 4 5}

qualification

The primary statement dates the revocation to 2021; a secondary account’s 2020 date is incorrect. The apology does not establish a renewed sponsorship or NFB approval of the product.

response

The company’s later account emphasizes listening to the disability community and a change in its marketing approach.

outcome

The retained record includes the apology but does not establish restoration of convention sponsorship.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Steve Faulkner: Subject of accessibility criticism. Period: Historical public debate. ³

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Haben Girma: Subject of accessibility criticism. Period: Historical public debate. ^{3 5}

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Mike Velcich: Recipient of investment commentary by K1 representative. Period: 2021 financing announcement. ⁶

qualification

The current portfolio listing supports an investor association, not a disclosed share percentage. A secondary account calls K1’s 2021 stake minority; no shareholder register establishes current control. Velcich’s present accessiBe board mandate is not confirmed.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Overlay False Claims: Subject of criticism concerning advertising claims. Period: Historical public debate. ^{7 4}

qualification

Many individual allegations are commentary, copied screenshots or summaries whose underlying platform records were not retained. They are not treated as additional regulatory findings or as proof that a particular investor’s agency ran a campaign. Criticism of the size of the FTC payment is opinion.

response

The company disputed several accounts and later apologized for its approach to community criticism; the FTC settlement involved no admission of its allegations.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Parkinson's Foundation: Named nonprofit collaborator, according to the company. Period: Retained company page. ²

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedMichael Hingson → National Federation of the Blind: Previous work and braille-literacy ambassador role. Period: Historical personal biography. ^{8 9}

qualification

These are company and personal accounts. His connection with the NFB does not make that organization responsible for, or a general endorser of, accessiBe’s products.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Overlay Fact Sheet: Subject of the Overlay Fact Sheet's criticism. Period: Retained community statement. ^{10 11}

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → Adrian Roselli: Subject of criticism about claimed JAWS collaboration. Period: Historical public debate. ⁴

qualification

These reports concern particular tests, user experiences or secondhand studies, not a fresh technical audit of current accessWidget. The original supplier denial, privacy assessment and every cited study are not retained. No privacy-law violation is established.

response

Ekerling acknowledged in a reported 2023 interview that the overlay was not a perfect solution; he also denied user tracking or selling data. Earlier responses disputed critics’ testing and explained increased automated-checker counts as a consequence of code changes.

attributedNational Federation of the Blind → accessiBe Ltd.: Revoked accessiBe's convention sponsorship. Period: 22 June 2021. ^{12 13}

qualification

The primary statement dates the revocation to 2021; a secondary account’s 2020 date is incorrect. The apology does not establish a renewed sponsorship or NFB approval of the product.

response

The company’s later account emphasizes listening to the disability community and a change in its marketing approach.

outcome

The retained record includes the apology but does not establish restoration of convention sponsorship.

attributedOverlay Fact Sheet → Steve Faulkner: Signed by Steve Faulkner. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedOverlay Fact Sheet → Adrian Roselli: Signed by Adrian Roselli. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedOverlay Fact Sheet → Karl Groves: Signed by Karl Groves. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedOverlay Fact Sheet → Lainey Feingold: Signed by Lainey Feingold. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedVispero → accessiBe Ltd.: Reported denial of claimed collaboration. Period: Secondary critical account; original denial not retained. ¹⁴

qualification

These reports concern particular tests, user experiences or secondhand studies, not a fresh technical audit of current accessWidget. The original supplier denial, privacy assessment and every cited study are not retained. No privacy-law violation is established.

response

Ekerling acknowledged in a reported 2023 interview that the overlay was not a perfect solution; he also denied user tracking or selling data. Earlier responses disputed critics’ testing and explained increased automated-checker counts as a consequence of code changes.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → National Federation of the Blind: Company apology published in the organization's journal. Period: May 2023. ¹⁴

qualification

The primary statement dates the revocation to 2021; a secondary account’s 2020 date is incorrect. The apology does not establish a renewed sponsorship or NFB approval of the product.

response

The company’s later account emphasizes listening to the disability community and a change in its marketing approach.

outcome

The retained record includes the apology but does not establish restoration of convention sponsorship.

attributedMichael Farlekas → Mike Velcich: Appointment was publicly commented on by K1 partner. Period: Onit announcement in 2024. ¹⁵

qualification

The ContextLogic filing does not mention accessiBe. Sources disagree on Onit’s start date, and the record does not show who appointed Farlekas to accessiBe’s board. His employment at companies associated with K1 does not prove a K1 appointment. Reports about E2open’s business performance are not findings of personal misconduct.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → United Spinal Association: Partner and Tech Access Council member according to company announcement. Period: October 2024. ¹⁶

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedGal Vizel → Dekel Skoop: Fellow co-founder of accessiBe. Period: Historical founding association. ¹⁷

qualification

Titles changed over time; founder status does not establish a current executive office or an ownership percentage.

attributedHaben Girma → Overlay Fact Sheet: Signatory. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedAccessible Web, Inc. → Overlay Fact Sheet: Employees appear among signatories; no blanket corporate endorsement inferred. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedNational Federation of the Blind → Overlay Fact Sheet: A branch official appears among signatories; no blanket corporate endorsement inferred. Period: Retained signatory list. ¹¹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedShir Ekerling → Adrian Roselli: Subject of criticism by Roselli. Period: Historical public debate. ¹⁴

qualification

Many individual allegations are commentary, copied screenshots or summaries whose underlying platform records were not retained. They are not treated as additional regulatory findings or as proof that a particular investor’s agency ran a campaign. Criticism of the size of the FTC payment is opinion.

response

The company disputed several accounts and later apologized for its approach to community criticism; the FTC settlement involved no admission of its allegations.

attributedKarl Groves → Overlay Fact Sheet: Creator of the fact-sheet site. Period: March 2021 account. ¹⁴

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedAdrian Roselli → World Wide Web Consortium: Working-group participant. Period: Retained professional biography. ¹⁸

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedSteve Faulkner → World Wide Web Consortium: Working-group participant and specification editor. Period: Retained professional biography. ¹⁹

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → The Third Place for Kids: Nonprofit program partner. Period: April 2025 counterpart announcement. ²⁰

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → World Wide Web Consortium: Membership announced by the company. Period: February 2021 announcement; current membership unverified. ¹⁴

qualification

The statement is an attributed professional and user position, not a court judgment. Their distinct professional and advocacy roles are retained without treating commercial competition as disproof or treating every participant as an independent source for the same statement.

response

In 2021 accessiBe described a learning curve for users, said some criticism came from competitors and maintained that critics had not adequately tested its product.

attributedaccessiBe Ltd. → United Spinal Association: Premier Corporate Member; not described here as highest tier. Period: Retained counterpart membership page. ²¹

qualification

The two counterpart statements support those specific associations, not endorsement of every product claim. “Premier” is the listed category, not a demonstrated highest sponsorship tier. Company claims of 600 or 700-plus partners and $500,000 donated are not audited here.